为什么不建一座美国到中国的桥梁呢

2019-10-23 14:20:33 | 来源: | 参与: 0

  Why don't we build a bridge from the US to China?

  我们为什么不建一座美国到中国的桥梁呢?

  以下是Quora读者的评论:

  Michael Feely, Architecture : I practice it.

  Problem 1: Your assumption about the cost and survivability of a 5,000 mile long bridge across the entire pacific is wildly optimistic. To put it in context, Donald Trump’s border wall with Mexico is estimated to cost $21 billion. And that's for an object 25% the length, that can be built on solid ground, that doesn't need a 10 lane highway on top, and that need not fear hurricane damage. Using other mega-bridge projects as a model we get costs between 25 and 100 times greater than the $20 billion estimate you have (Call it $500billion to $2 trillion. And count on $2 trillion being closer to correct)

  Problem 2: A bridge implies a single start point and an end point. Presumably Shanghai to Long Beach or so. But what happens to cargo from Hong Komg to San Francisco. Does it have to go up the coast, to the bridge, and then up the coast again?

  Problem 3: To the extent that this bridge gets used, it basically is a target for half the people in the Pacific with an economic grudge. Security is going to be a headache.

  Problem 4: Why just the US and China. Why doesn't Japan get an off-ramp? How about South Korea?

  问题1:你对横跨整个太平洋、5000英里长的桥梁的成本和耐用性过于乐观了。相比之下,唐纳德·特朗普拟建的墨西哥边境墙估计耗资210亿美元。长度只是这座桥的25%,可以建在坚实的地面上,不需要10车道,也不需要担心飓风的破坏。以其他的特大桥项目为模型,我们得到的成本是你估计的200亿美元的25到100倍(5000亿到2万亿美元)。2万亿美元更准确。

  问题2:桥得有起点和终点。假定是从上海到长滩吧。那么从香港到旧金山的货物怎么办?它必须沿海岸向上,上桥,再沿海岸继续向上?

  问题3:就这座桥的使用程度而言,它会是太平洋地区一半对经济不满的人的攻击目标。安全问题将令人头痛。

  问题4:为什么只提到美国和中国?日本不能搞个出口匝道?韩国呢?

  Problem 5: Now for the kicker. Average freight costs per ton-mile run about 15 cents for trucking, 5 cents for railroads- and about 3 cents for trans-oceanic container ships. Assuming you have a railroad on this bridge and a modest toll to pay for the original construction cost of the bridge, it would likely run about 6 cents per ton-mile to ship on. So there will be no payback, because there are already cheaper modes of transportation available. In theory, it will attract some cargo away from ships because it will be faster - container ships run around 37–46 km/h, whereas you could probably double that speed with rail freight on this giant bridge. But that’s about it for potential users.

  问题5:现在挑刺的人要跳出来了。货运每吨英里的平均运费为15美分,铁路为5美分,跨洋集装箱船为3美分。假设你在这座桥上铺设一条铁路,每吨英里的运输费用大概是6美分。所以得不偿失,因为已经有更便宜的交通方式了。从理论上讲,它能吸引一些货运,因为它的速度会更快—集装箱船运行约37-46公里/小时,而通过这座桥梁运输,速度可以加倍。但只针对潜在用户的。

  Nischal Ranjinath Muniandy, studied at KDU University College

  The answer is essentially down to a few core reasons.

  It cost a lot more than $4 million/mile for one thing. You would have to get tonnes of machinery, material and personnel thousands of kilometers into the open ocean. If we based this theoretical bridge on the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge, it would cost at least $415 billion dollars and that’s mainly an overland viaduct. Basing it on the Dubai Floating Bridge would net us a cost of 2.125 trillion dollars. And this is not including the cost of maintenance.

  And not to mention that this bridge would have to withstand any extreme weather events and be tall enough to avoid ships crashing into it.

  But let’s just say for the sake of argument, this bridge was complete and is 5,000 miles from end to end. How will people get across? By road? Going at 100 mph, it would take 50 hours of non-stop driving to get from one end to another. And that would necessitate having a lot of amenities for drivers. Rest stops, gas stations, emergency services and perhaps even hotels. That would only add to the initial cost of construction and the cost of maintenance, but now you have a large labour cost as well. If someone is going to work in the literal middle of nowhere that’s a day’s drive from anywhere else, you bet they’d want to be paid and housed decently.

  答案基本上可以归结为几个核心原因。

  每英里的成本远远超过400万美元。你不得不把成吨的机器、材料和人员运到几千公里外的公海。如果我们把这座理论上的桥建在丹阳-昆山大桥上,它将花费至少4150亿美元,主要是陆上高架桥。将它建在迪拜浮桥上将为我们带来2.125万亿美元的净成本。还不包括维护费用。

  更不用提这座桥还需承受任何极端天气事件,还要足够高以避免船只撞到桥上。

  但是为了方便讨论,我们只说这座桥从一端到另一端长达5000英里。人们要如何通行?通过公路吗?以每小时100英里的速度行驶,需要连续行驶50个小时。这就需要为司机提供很多便利设施。休息站,加油站,紧急服务,甚至酒店。这只会增加最初的建设成本和维护成本,但现在劳动力成本都极高。

正在加载

精彩阅读

热点排行
  • 日排行
  • 周排行
评论排行
  • 周排行
  • 月排行

-->